linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: avoid sleep in IRQ context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABXRUiRscm=b0=bS-Dcxr_7bE45vcqv98SzJCBVsO67cgJOByg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:04:19 +0800
From:   Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
To:     "Adamski, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)" 
        <krzysztof.adamski@...ia.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: avoid sleep in IRQ context

Adamski, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <krzysztof.adamski@...ia.com>
於 2019年8月7日週三 下午2:51寫道：
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 08:31:34PM +0800, Fuqian Huang wrote:
> >i2c_pxa_handler -> i2c_pxa_irq_txempty ->
> >i2c_pxa_reset -> i2c_pxa_set_slave -> i2c_pxa_wait_slave
> >
> >As i2c_pxa_handler is an interrupt handler, it will finally
> >calls i2c_pxa_wait_slave which calls msleep.
> >
> >Add in_interrupt check before msleep to avoid sleep
> >in IRQ context.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
> >---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
> >index 2c3c3d6935c0..b35a0e8efcb2 100644
> >--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
> >+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
> >@@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ static int i2c_pxa_wait_slave(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
> >
> >       show_state(i2c);
> >
> >+      if (in_interrupt())
> >+              return 0;
>
> Sleeping in irq context is not good indeed but if you just return here,
> an error will be printed from i2c_pxa_set_slave() and cleanup of ICR
> will be skipped. Is that ok?
Sorry for this mistake.
Maybe it should be changed to mdelay.
And the new patch is like this:
if (in_interrupt()) {
   mdelay(1);
} else {
   msleep(1);
}
>
> >       while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> >               if (i2c_debug > 1)
> >                       dev_dbg(&i2c->adap.dev, "%s: %ld: ISR=%08x, ICR=%08x, IBMR=%02x\n",
>