linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: add missing PTE_SPECIAL in pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190807092427.GB63492@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:24:28 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jia He <justin.he@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
        Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Jun Yao <yaojun8558363@...il.com>,
        Alex Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: add missing PTE_SPECIAL in pte_mkdevmap on
 arm64

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:09:29AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:58:51PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > index 5fdcfe237338..e09760ece844 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_mkcont(pmd_t pmd)
> >  
> >  static inline pte_t pte_mkdevmap(pte_t pte)
> >  {
> > -	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DEVMAP));
> > +	return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DEVMAP | PTE_SPECIAL));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> > @@ -396,7 +396,10 @@ static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> >  #define pmd_devmap(pmd)		pte_devmap(pmd_pte(pmd))
> >  #endif
> > -#define pmd_mkdevmap(pmd)	pte_pmd(pte_mkdevmap(pmd_pte(pmd)))
> > +static inline pmd_t pmd_mkdevmap(pmd_t pmd)
> > +{
> > +	return pte_pmd(set_pte_bit(pmd_pte(pmd), __pgprot(PTE_DEVMAP)));
> > +}
> >  
> >  #define __pmd_to_phys(pmd)	__pte_to_phys(pmd_pte(pmd))
> >  #define __phys_to_pmd_val(phys)	__phys_to_pte_val(phys)
> 
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> 
> I think Catalin can take this as a fix, although the commit message should
> probably be trimmed down a bit to remove the two call traces etc.

I'll queue this for -rc4 and sort out the commit message. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin