[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190807094759.GQ28208@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:47:59 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 12/32] Btrfs: fix deadlock between fiemap
and transaction commits
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:35:00PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit a6d155d2e363f26290ffd50591169cb96c2a609e ]
>
> Fixes: 03628cdbc64db6 ("Btrfs: do not start a transaction during fiemap")
The commit is a regression fix during the 5.2 cycle, how it could end up
in a 4.19 stable candidate?
$ git describe 03628cdbc64db6
v5.1-rc7-201-g03628cdbc64d
$ git describe --contains 03628cdbc64db6
v5.2-rc1~163^2~26
And it does not belong to 5.2 either, git cherry-pick on top of 5.2
fails.
I think such sanity check can be done automatically so the patches don't
accidentally land in trees where don't belong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists