lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190807094759.GQ28208@suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:47:59 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 12/32] Btrfs: fix deadlock between fiemap
 and transaction commits

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:35:00PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit a6d155d2e363f26290ffd50591169cb96c2a609e ]
> 
> Fixes: 03628cdbc64db6 ("Btrfs: do not start a transaction during fiemap")

The commit is a regression fix during the 5.2 cycle, how it could end up
in a 4.19 stable candidate?

$ git describe  03628cdbc64db6
v5.1-rc7-201-g03628cdbc64d

$ git describe --contains 03628cdbc64db6
v5.2-rc1~163^2~26

And it does not belong to 5.2 either, git cherry-pick on top of 5.2
fails.

I think such sanity check can be done automatically so the patches don't
accidentally land in trees where don't belong.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ