[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908071452350.24014@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@...il.com>
cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NULL ptr deref in wq_worker_sleeping on 4.19
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Austin Kim wrote:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> I wonder what kinds of workqueue is used in case of this panic.
>
> If system workqueue(system_wq) is used for this case, it would be a
> help to replace it with high priority workqueue(system_highpri_wq). If
> panic disappers with high priority workqueue(system_highpri_wq), we
> would think about another scenario.
How would that help? As Sebastian explained, something overwrote memory or
it is a Use After Free. How would a high priority workqueue 'fix' that?
You need to find the root cause, which is either memory corruption or a use
after free.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists