[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874l2tuo0t.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:02:26 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
diana.craciun@....com, christophe.leroy@....fr,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, npiggin@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
yebin10@...wei.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
jingxiangfeng@...wei.com, fanchengyang@...wei.com,
zhaohongjiang@...wei.com, Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] powerpc: move memstart_addr and kernstart_addr to init-common.c
Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com> writes:
> These two variables are both defined in init_32.c and init_64.c. Move
> them to init-common.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
> Cc: Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> Reviewed-by: Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>
> Tested-by: Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/init-common.c | 5 +++++
> arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c | 5 -----
> arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c | 5 -----
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init-common.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init-common.c
> index a84da92920f7..152ae0d21435 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init-common.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/kup.h>
>
> +phys_addr_t memstart_addr = (phys_addr_t)~0ull;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memstart_addr);
> +phys_addr_t kernstart_addr;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernstart_addr);
Would be nice if these can be __ro_after_init ?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists