lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 20:10:05 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
Cc:     "open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, dvander@...il.com,
        Yifan Hong <elsk@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: Add LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO in compat ioctl

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 7:57 PM Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> I was considering the rationale for this patch totally straightforward:
> it enables Direct I/O ioctl to 32 bit processes running on 64 bit
> systems for compatibility reasons, as for all the other lo_compat_ioctl
> commands.
> Also the reason why someone would decide to use Direct I/O with loop
> devices is well known, that is why the feature exists :) So I thought
> this was another redundant information to put in the commit message and
> decided to omit it.

No objections from me if maintainers are Ok with it.

> If you still think that I should update the commit message with this
> information, I will do so.

I think you should.

thanks,

 - Joel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ