[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190807140744.GA18224@onstation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:07:44 -0400
From: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] gpio: hierarchical IRQ improvements
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 03:41:05PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:01 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
>
> > This builds on top of Linus Walleij's existing patches that adds
> > hierarchical IRQ support to the GPIO core [1] so that Qualcomm's
> > spmi-gpio and ssbi-gpio can be converted to use these new helpers.
> >
> > Linus: Feel free to squash these into your existing patches if you'd
> > like to use any of this code. Just give me some kind of mention in the
> > commit description.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20190624132531.6184-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org/
> >
> > Brian Masney (4):
> > gpio: introduce gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_{two,four}cell
> > functions
> > gpio: allow customizing hierarchical IRQ chips
> > gpio: use handler in gpio_irq_chip instead of handle_bad_irq
> > qcom: spmi-gpio: convert to hierarchical IRQ helpers in gpio core
>
> I solved things like this:
>
> - I kept patches 1 & 4 as-is
> - I squashed patches 2 and 3 into the main patch with minor modifications.
> - I added Co-developed-by: for your contributions
>
> Now I need to address Masahiro's comments on top and let's see if the
> result looks acceptable!
> Ooops had to squash patch 1 as well...
All of this sounds good. I'll retest once you send out the updated
series.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists