[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-5befbd83-7239-4ee0-8c03-06e377e53f72@palmer-si-x1e>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To: Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, info@...ux.net,
allison@...utok.net, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>, mark.rutland@....com,
johan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, tiny.windzz@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] RISC-V: Fix unsupported isa string info.
On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:31:51 PDT (-0700), Atish Patra wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:26 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Atish Patra wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:27 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> >
>> > > Seems like the "su" should be dropped from mandatory_ext. What
>> > > do you
>> > > think?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Yup. As DT binding only mention imafdc, mandatory extensions should
>> > contain only that and just consider "su" extensions are considered
>> > as
>> > implicit as we are running Linux.
>>
>> Discussing this with Andrew and Palmer, it looks like "su" is
>> currently
>> non-compliant. Section 22.6 of the user-level specification states
>> that
>> the "s" character indicates that a longer standard supervisor
>> extension
>> name will follow. So far I don't think any of these have been
>> defined.
>>
>> > Do you think QEMU DT should be updated to reflect that ?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > > There's no Kconfig option by this name, and we're requiring
>> > > compressed
>> >
>> > Sorry. This was a typo. It should have been CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C.
>> >
>> > > instruction support as part of the RISC-V Linux baseline. Could
>> > > you
>> > > share the rationale behind this?
>> >
>> > I think I added this check at the config file. Looking at the
>> > Kconfig,
>> > RISCV_ISA_C is always enabled. So we can drop this.
>>
>> OK great. Do you want to resend an updated patch, or would you like
>> me to
>> fix it up here?
>>
>
> I am sending the patch right now. We can remove the 'S' mode check as
> palmer have already sent the QEMU patch as well, .
Looks like I missed the boat for 4.1, though.
>
> Regards,
> Atish
>> I'll also send a patch to drop CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C.
>>
>>
>> - Paul
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists