linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: phy: Add support for generic LED configuration through the DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190807181536.GA26047@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 7 Aug 2019 20:15:36 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: phy: Add support for generic LED
 configuration through the DT

> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		u32 led;
> +
> +		if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &led))
> +			goto skip_config;


> +
> +	skip_config:
> +		of_node_put(child);

There is no need for this put. So long as you don't break out of
for_each_child_of_node() with a return, it will correctly release
child at the end of each loop. A continue statement is also O.K.

      Andrew