[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190807204530.GB90900@google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:45:30 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christian Hansen <chansen3@...co.com>, dancol@...gle.com,
fmayer@...gle.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, minchan@...nel.org,
namhyung@...gle.com, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, surenb@...gle.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, tkjos@...gle.com,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/page_idle: Add per-pid idle page tracking
using virtual index
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:04:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:15:54 -0400 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> > In Android, we are using this for the heap profiler (heapprofd) which
> > profiles and pin points code paths which allocates and leaves memory
> > idle for long periods of time. This method solves the security issue
> > with userspace learning the PFN, and while at it is also shown to yield
> > better results than the pagemap lookup, the theory being that the window
> > where the address space can change is reduced by eliminating the
> > intermediate pagemap look up stage. In virtual address indexing, the
> > process's mmap_sem is held for the duration of the access.
>
> So is heapprofd a developer-only thing? Is heapprofd included in
> end-user android loads? If not then, again, wouldn't it be better to
> make the feature Kconfigurable so that Android developers can enable it
> during development then disable it for production kernels?
Almost all of this code is already configurable with
CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING. If you disable it, then all of this code gets
disabled.
Or are you referring to something else that needs to be made configurable?
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists