[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:28:29 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, od@...c.me,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: Remove unused compatible strings
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 08:04:25PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > Right now none of the Ingenic-based boards probe this driver from
> > devicetree. This driver defined three compatible strings for the exact
> > same behaviour. Before these strings are used, we can remove two of
> > them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > v2: Rebase on v5.2-rc3
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ingenic,jz47xx-pwm.txt | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ingenic,jz47xx-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ingenic,jz47xx-pwm.txt
> > index 7d9d3f90641b..493bec80d59b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ingenic,jz47xx-pwm.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ingenic,jz47xx-pwm.txt
> > @@ -2,10 +2,7 @@ Ingenic JZ47xx PWM Controller
> > =============================
> >
> > Required properties:
> > -- compatible: One of:
> > - * "ingenic,jz4740-pwm"
> > - * "ingenic,jz4770-pwm"
> > - * "ingenic,jz4780-pwm"
> > +- compatible: Should be "ingenic,jz4740-pwm"
>
> Are you sure all 3 chips are exactly the same features and bugs?
>
> The correct thing to do here generally is the 4770 and 4780 would also
> have ingenic,jz4740-pwm as a fallback compatible. Then the driver can
> match on that until you find some difference and can use the more
> specific compatible.
Note that Thierry already applied this patch before your concern reached
the mailing list. Is this bad enough to revert
925488e8df4f396ad96ff008a84f5b14d8b73347?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists