lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:31:01 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers/ras: Don't build debugfs.o if no debugfs
 in config

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:55:56PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> There's no reason to build the debugfs.o if the kernel config doesn't
> even include CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/Makefile b/drivers/ras/Makefile
> index ef6777e14d3d..07a5c391cc23 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/ras/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> -obj-$(CONFIG_RAS)	+= ras.o debugfs.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RAS)	+= ras.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS),y)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RAS)	+= debugfs.o
> +endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RAS_CEC)	+= cec.o

If this is not causing real trouble then I'd prefer to keep it this way
because ras.c is pretty useless without the debugfs functionality.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ