linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: change list for KVM/s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190809110425.45a62e7a.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:04:25 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: change list for KVM/s390

On Fri,  9 Aug 2019 09:19:16 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:

> KVM/s390 does not have a list of its own, and linux-s390 is in the
> loop anyway thanks to the generic arch/s390 match.  So use the generic
> KVM list for s390 patches.

Let's add the s390 list manually just for this patch, for awareness :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1aec93695040..6498ebaca2f6 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8788,7 +8788,7 @@ M:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>  M:	Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
>  R:	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>  R:	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> -L:	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> +L:	kvm@...r.kernel.org
>  W:	http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/
>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git
>  S:	Supported

Yes, get_maintainers.pl should add in the s390 list, so that sounds
fine.

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>