[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wofmty80.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 13:44:15 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: "gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jbergsagel\@ti.com" <jbergsagel@...com>,
"nsekhar\@ti.com" <nsekhar@...com>, "nm\@ti.com" <nm@...com>,
Suresh Punnoose <sureshp@...ence.com>,
Jayshri Dajiram Pawar <jpawar@...ence.com>,
Rahul Kumar <kurahul@...ence.com>,
Anil Joy Varughese <aniljoy@...ence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Introduced new Cadence USBSS DRD Driver.
Hi,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> writes:
>> It allows me for testing some functionality using only single board
>> and even with lacking right cable for proper otg detection.
>>
>> So, removing this can cause that testing some functionality
>> will be limited on my boards.
>>
>> If you rely want to remove this, maybe we could do this
>> after putting this driver to kernel ?.
>
> I don't want you to remove the user based role change functionality.
> I'm just asking to rely on role switch framework for that and not debugfs.
I agree with Roger. Use role switch framework for production, not debugfs.
--
balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists