linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 05/21] clk: tegra: pll: Save and restore pll context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68f65db6-44b7-1c75-2633-4a2fffd62a92@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 14:33:18 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, stefan@...er.ch, mark.rutland@....com
Cc:     pdeschrijver@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        jckuo@...dia.com, josephl@...dia.com, talho@...dia.com,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mperttunen@...dia.com, spatra@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/21] clk: tegra: pll: Save and restore pll context

09.08.2019 2:46, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
> This patch implements save and restore of PLL context.
> 
> During system suspend, core power goes off and looses the settings
> of the Tegra CAR controller registers.
> 
> So during suspend entry pll context is stored and on resume it is
> restored back along with its state.
> 
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h     |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> index 1583f5fc992f..e52add2bbdbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> @@ -1008,6 +1008,28 @@ static unsigned long clk_plle_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> +static void tegra_clk_pll_restore_context(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
> +	struct clk_hw *parent = clk_hw_get_parent(hw);
> +	unsigned long parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
> +	unsigned long rate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (clk_pll_is_enabled(hw))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (pll->params->set_defaults)
> +		pll->params->set_defaults(pll);
> +
> +	clk_pll_set_rate(hw, rate, parent_rate);
> +
> +	if (!__clk_get_enable_count(hw->clk))

What about orphaned clocks? Is enable_count > 0 for them?

> +		clk_pll_disable(hw);
> +	else
> +		clk_pll_enable(hw);
> +}

[snip]