[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190809134241.664708388@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 15:45:06 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 02/21] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG}
commit 147b9635e6347104b91f48ca9dca61eb0fbf2a54 upstream.
If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have
their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous
machines.
Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively
saturate at zero.
Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.4.y only
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 ++++---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index ad83c245781c3..0a66f8241f185 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -41,9 +41,10 @@
/* CPU feature register tracking */
enum ftr_type {
- FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
- FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
- FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */
+ FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
+ FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
+ FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe */
+ FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */
};
#define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index fff0bf2f889e1..062484d344509 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ static struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 30, 1, 0),
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 29, 1, 1), /* DIC */
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 1, 1), /* IDC */
- U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0), /* CWG */
- U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0), /* ERG */
+ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, 24, 4, 0), /* CWG */
+ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, 20, 4, 0), /* ERG */
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 1), /* DminLine */
/*
* Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will
@@ -341,6 +341,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new, s64 cur)
case FTR_LOWER_SAFE:
ret = new < cur ? new : cur;
break;
+ case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE:
+ if (!cur || !new)
+ break;
+ /* Fallthrough */
case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE:
ret = new > cur ? new : cur;
break;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists