lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190809165207.GA18104@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:52:07 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, od@...c.me,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: jz4740: Driver update

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller
> pieces for easier integration to mainline.
> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837)
> 
> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The exception
> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function was
> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree.
> 
> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 branch of
> the MIPS tree
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git).
> 

What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream
through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ?

Thanks,
Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ