linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190810074601.GA23926@lst.de>
Date:   Sat, 10 Aug 2019 09:46:01 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     mpe@...erman.id.au
Cc:     Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>,
        Mike Anderson <andmike@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:51:41PM +1000, mpe@...erman.id.au wrote:
> I need to take this series via the powerpc tree because there is another
> fairly large powerpc specific series dependent on it.
> 
> I think this series already has pretty much all the acks it needs, which
> almost never happens, amazing work!
> 
> I'll put the series in a topic branch, just in case there's any bad
> conflicts and other folks want to merge it later on. I'll then merge the
> topic branch into my next, and so this series will be tested in
> linux-next that way.

Sounds good to me, I don't expect conflicts from the dma-mapping tree.