| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeutP=W43GHtY+FKvVGjBnQrF+nKbdaq_QXy8ZCoS=k1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 16:09:21 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
paulmck@...ux.ibm.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [v4 2/6] media: platform: dwc: Add MIPI CSI-2 controller driver
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 5:38 PM Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> > Add the Synopsys MIPI CSI-2 controller driver. This
> > controller driver is divided in platform functions and core functions.
> > This way it serves as platform for future DesignWare drivers.
> > +const struct mipi_dt csi_dt[] = {
>
> Make this static or use a common prefix that somehow resembles the name
> name of the driver.
>
> > + {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV420_8,
> > + .name = "YUV420_8bits",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV420_10,
> > + .name = "YUV420_10bits",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV420_8_LEG,
> > + .name = "YUV420_8bits_LEGACY",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV420_8_SHIFT,
> > + .name = "YUV420_8bits_SHIFT",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV420_10_SHIFT,
> > + .name = "YUV420_10bits_SHIFT",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV422_8,
> > + .name = "YUV442_8bits",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_YUV422_10,
> > + .name = "YUV442_10bits",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RGB444,
> > + .name = "RGB444",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RGB555,
> > + .name = "RGB555",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RGB565,
> > + .name = "RGB565",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RGB666,
> > + .name = "RGB666",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RGB888,
> > + .name = "RGB888",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW6,
> > + .name = "RAW6",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW7,
> > + .name = "RAW7",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW8,
> > + .name = "RAW8",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW10,
> > + .name = "RAW10",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW12,
> > + .name = "RAW12",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW14,
> > + .name = "RAW14",
> > + }, {
> > + .hex = CSI_2_RAW16,
> > + .name = "RAW16",
> > + },
> > +};
One may utilize __stringify() macro and do somelike
#define CSI_FMT_DESC(fmt) \
{ .hex = CSI_2_##fmt, .name = __stringify(fmt), }
And do
CSI_FMT_DESC(RAW16),
etc.
> > + return cfg ? v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(&dev->sd,
> > + cfg,
> > + 0) : NULL;
This indentation looks ugly.
I would rather put this on one line.
> > + dev_dbg(dev->dev,
> > + "%s got v4l2_mbus_pixelcode. 0x%x\n", __func__,
> > + dev->format.code);
> > + dev_dbg(dev->dev,
> > + "%s got width. 0x%x\n", __func__,
> > + dev->format.width);
> > + dev_dbg(dev->dev,
> > + "%s got height. 0x%x\n", __func__,
> > + dev->format.height);
__func__ is usually redundant (if Dynamic Debug in use it can be
switched at run-time).
> I'd just omit these debug prints in a driver. But adding them to the
> framework might make sense. We don't have a lot of debug prints dealing
> with user parameters in there. OTOH the common test programs largely do the
> same already.
I would rather see tracepoints instead of debug prints if we are
talking about generic solution for entire framework.
>
> > + return &dev->format;
> > +}
> > + struct mipi_fmt *dev_fmt;
This is simple bad name. We have dev_fmt() macro. I would rather avoid
potential collisions.
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf;
> > +
> > + mf = dw_mipi_csi_get_format(dev, cfg, fmt->which);
> > + if (!mf)
> > + return -EINVAL;
Can't you rather return an error pointer in this and similar cases?
> > + dev_vdbg(dev->dev, "%s: on=%d\n", __func__, on);
This is noise. If you would like to debug Function Tracer is a good start.
> > + of_id = of_match_node(dw_mipi_csi_of_match, dev->of_node);
> > + if (!of_id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
Is it possible to have this asserted?
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + if (!res)
> > + return -ENXIO;
Redundant. Below does the check for you.
> > +
> > + csi->base_address = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(csi->base_address)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Base address not set.\n");
Redundant. Above does print an error message for you.
> > + return PTR_ERR(csi->base_address);
> > + }
Moreover, use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() instead of both.
> > + csi->ctrl_irq_number = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (csi->ctrl_irq_number < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "irq number %d not set.\n", csi->ctrl_irq_number);
Redundant since this cycle (v5.4).
> > + ret = csi->ctrl_irq_number;
Better to do the opposite
ret = platform_get_irq();
if (ret)
goto end;
... = ret;
> > + goto end;
> > + }
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, csi->ctrl_irq_number,
> > + dw_mipi_csi_irq1, IRQF_SHARED,
> > + dev_name(dev), csi);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "irq csi %s failed\n", of_id->name);
> > +
> > + goto end;
> > + }
devm_*irq() might be a bad idea. Is it race free in your driver?
> > +static const struct of_device_id dw_mipi_csi_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "snps,dw-csi" },
> > + {},
Better without comma. Terminator may terminate even at compile time.
> > +};
> > +static ssize_t core_version_show(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct dw_csi *csi_dev = sd_to_mipi_csi_dev(sd);
> > +
> > + char buffer[10];
> > +
> > + snprintf(buffer, 10, "v.%d.%d*\n", csi_dev->hw_version_major,
> > + csi_dev->hw_version_minor);
> > +
> > + return strlcpy(buf, buffer, PAGE_SIZE);
Oh, can't you simple without any temprorary useless buffers?
sprintf(buf, ...)?
(Yes, note _absence_ of *n* there)
> > +}
> > +static ssize_t n_lanes_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + unsigned long lanes;
> > +
More blank lines! We need them!
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct dw_csi *csi_dev = sd_to_mipi_csi_dev(sd);
> > +
> > + ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &lanes);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
Can it return positive number?
> > + dev_info(dev, "Lanes %lu\n", lanes);
Noise.
The user gets it, why to spam kernel log???
> > + csi_dev->hw.num_lanes = lanes;
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
I told once, can repeat again. Synopsys perhaps needs better reviews
inside company. Each time I see the code, it repeats same mistakes
over and over. Have you, guys, do something about it?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists