linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-5.3-4 tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whnEp5+EM53MaT-3ep1xjhrUqCdcfBfTF9YxByGsmDMRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:21:01 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-5.3-4 tag

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:11 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Just one fix, a revert of a commit that was meant to be a minor improvement to
> some inline asm, but ended up having no real benefit with GCC and broke booting
> 32-bit machines when using Clang.

Pulled, but whenever there are possible subtle compiler issues I get
nervous, and wonder if the problem was reported to the clang guys?

In particular, if the kernel change was technically correct, maybe
somebody else comes along in a few years and tries the same, and then
it's another odd "why doesn't this work for person X when it works
just fine for me"..

                 Linus