linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: Lookup PCS register offset based on PCI device ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:22:12 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Douthit <stephend@...icom-usa.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: Lookup PCS register offset based on PCI device ID

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:43 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:24:31PM +0000, Stephen Douthit wrote:
> > Intel moved the PCS register from 0x92 to 0x94 on Denverton for some
> > reason, so now we get to check the device ID before poking it on reset.
>
> And now you just match on the new IDs, which means we'll perpetually
> catch up on any new device.  Dan, can you reach out inside Intel to
> figure out if there is a way to find out the PCS register location
> without the PCI ID check?

I'll ask. One guess for now is that num_ports >= 8 indicates the new
layout since the old layout ran out of space, but that might fall over
if the SOC uses the new layout, but implements fewer ports.