[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190811225252.GB15116@mellanox.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:52:58 +0000
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] resource: add a not device managed
request_free_mem_region variant
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:12:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just add a simple macro that passes a NULL dev argument to
> dev_request_free_mem_region, and call request_mem_region in the
> function for that particular case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> include/linux/ioport.h | 2 ++
> kernel/resource.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> index 0dcc48cafa80..528ae6cbb1b4 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> @@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ static inline bool resource_overlaps(struct resource *r1, struct resource *r2)
>
> struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
> struct resource *base, unsigned long size, const char *name);
> +#define request_free_mem_region(base, size, name) \
> + devm_request_free_mem_region(NULL, base, size, name)
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> #endif /* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 0ddc558586a7..3a826b3cc883 100644
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -1671,7 +1671,10 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
> REGION_DISJOINT)
> continue;
>
> - res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, addr, size, name);
> + if (dev)
> + res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, addr, size, name);
> + else
> + res = request_mem_region(addr, size, name);
It is a bit jarring to have something called devm_* that doesn't
actually do the devm_ part on some paths.
Maybe this function should be called __request_free_mem_region() with
another name wrapper macro?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists