[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09a2faf0-a26f-6374-130a-3b33b1b712d5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:20:55 -0700
From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ashok.raj@...el.com, keith.busch@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] PCI/ATS: Fix pci_prg_resp_pasid_required()
dependency issues
On 8/12/19 1:04 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 05:05:58PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Since pci_prg_resp_pasid_required() function has dependency on both
>> PASID and PRI, define it only if both CONFIG_PCI_PRI and
>> CONFIG_PCI_PASID config options are enabled.
> I don't really like this. It makes the #ifdefs more complicated and I
> don't think it really buys us anything. Will anything break if we
> just drop this patch?
Yes, this function uses "pri_lock" mutex which is only defined if
CONFIG_PCI_PRI is enabled. So not protecting this function within
CONFIG_PCI_PRI will lead to compilation issues.
>
>> Fixes: e5567f5f6762 ("PCI/ATS: Add pci_prg_resp_pasid_required()
>> interface.")
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/ats.c | 10 ++++++----
>> include/linux/pci-ats.h | 12 +++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/ats.c b/drivers/pci/ats.c
>> index e18499243f84..cdd936d10f68 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
>> @@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ int pci_pasid_features(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_pasid_features);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PRI
>> +
>> /**
>> * pci_prg_resp_pasid_required - Return PRG Response PASID Required bit
>> * status.
>> @@ -402,10 +404,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_pasid_features);
>> *
>> * Returns 1 if PASID is required in PRG Response Message, 0 otherwise.
>> *
>> - * Even though the PRG response PASID status is read from PRI Status
>> - * Register, since this API will mainly be used by PASID users, this
>> - * function is defined within #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PASID instead of
>> - * CONFIG_PCI_PRI.
>> + * Since this API has dependency on both PRI and PASID, protect it
>> + * with both CONFIG_PCI_PRI and CONFIG_PCI_PASID.
>> */
>> int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_prg_resp_pasid_required);
>>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #define PASID_NUMBER_SHIFT 8
>> #define PASID_NUMBER_MASK (0x1f << PASID_NUMBER_SHIFT)
>> /**
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ats.h b/include/linux/pci-ats.h
>> index 1ebb88e7c184..1a0bdaee2f32 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci-ats.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci-ats.h
>> @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ void pci_disable_pasid(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> void pci_restore_pasid_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> int pci_pasid_features(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> int pci_max_pasids(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> -int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>>
>> #else /* CONFIG_PCI_PASID */
>>
>> @@ -67,11 +66,18 @@ static inline int pci_max_pasids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_PASID */
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PCI_PRI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_PASID)
>> +
>> +int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> +
>> +#else /* CONFIG_PCI_PASID && CONFIG_PCI_PRI */
>> +
>> static inline int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_PASID */
>> -
>> +#endif
>>
>> #endif /* LINUX_PCI_ATS_H*/
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists