| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190812204633.GB20634@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:46:33 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] mm/gup: Prep put_user_pages() to take an
vaddr_pin struct
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 05:30:00PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 8/9/19 3:58 PM, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> > Once callers start to use vaddr_pin the put_user_pages calls will need
> > to have access to this data coming in. Prep put_user_pages() for this
> > data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
[snip]
> > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> > index a7a9d2f5278c..10cfd30ff668 100644
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -24,30 +24,41 @@
> >
> > #include "internal.h"
> >
> > -/**
> > - * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages
> > - * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released.
>
> A couple comments from our circular review chain: some fellow with the same
> last name as you, recommended wording it like this:
>
> @pages: array of pages to be put
Sure, see below...
>
> > - * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
> > - * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty
> > - *
> > - * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
> > - * variants called on that page.
> > - *
> > - * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
> > - * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously
> > - * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(),
> > - * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case.
> > - *
> > - * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
> > - *
> > - * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is
> > - * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct,
> > - * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it:
> > - * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page().
> > - *
> > - */
> > -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
> > - bool make_dirty)
> > +static void __put_user_page(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + page = compound_head(page);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For devmap managed pages we need to catch refcount transition from
> > + * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS to 1, when refcount reach one it means the
> > + * page is free and we need to inform the device driver through
> > + * callback. See include/linux/memremap.h and HMM for details.
> > + */
> > + if (put_devmap_managed_page(page))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (put_page_testzero(page))
> > + __put_page(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __put_user_pages(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page **pages,
> > + unsigned long npages)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long index;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
> > + * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
> > + * single operation to the head page should suffice.
> > + */
>
> As discussed in the other review thread (""), let's just delete that comment,
> as long as you're moving things around.
Done.
>
>
> > + for (index = 0; index < npages; index++)
> > + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, pages[index]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin,
> > + struct page **pages,
> > + unsigned long npages,
> > + bool make_dirty)
>
> Elsewhere in this series, we pass vaddr_pin at the end of the arg list.
> Here we pass it at the beginning, and it caused a minor jar when reading it.
> Obviously just bike shedding at this point, though. Either way. :)
Yea I guess that is odd... I changed it. Not a big deal.
>
> > {
> > unsigned long index;
> >
> > @@ -58,7 +69,7 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
> > */
> >
> > if (!make_dirty) {
> > - put_user_pages(pages, npages);
> > + __put_user_pages(vaddr_pin, pages, npages);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -86,9 +97,58 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
> > */
> > if (!PageDirty(page))
> > set_page_dirty_lock(page);
> > - put_user_page(page);
> > + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, page);
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page
> > + * @page: pointer to page to be released
> > + *
> > + * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via
> > + * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines
> > + * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via
> > + * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In
> > + * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special
> > + * handling.
> > + *
> > + * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early
> > + * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must
> > + * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls.
> > + */
> > +void put_user_page(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + __put_user_page(NULL, page);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_page);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages
> > + * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released.
>
> Same here:
>
> @pages: array of pages to be put
Actually here is the only place. Above was removing the text to be put here...
Done -- I'll made a lead in patch because this was just copied text.
>
> > + * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
> > + * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty
> > + *
> > + * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
> > + * variants called on that page.
> > + *
> > + * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
> > + * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously
> > + * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(),
> > + * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case.
> > + *
> > + * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
> > + *
> > + * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is
> > + * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct,
> > + * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it:
> > + * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page().
> > + *
> > + */
> > +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
> > + bool make_dirty)
> > +{
> > + __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(NULL, pages, npages, make_dirty);
> > +}
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -102,15 +162,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
> > */
> > void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
> > {
> > - unsigned long index;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
> > - * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
> > - * single operation to the head page should suffice.
> > - */
> > - for (index = 0; index < npages; index++)
> > - put_user_page(pages[index]);
> > + __put_user_pages(NULL, pages, npages);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages);
> >
> >
>
> This all looks pretty good, so regardless of the outcome of the minor
> points above,
>
> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Thanks,
Ira
>
>
> thanks,
> --
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists