linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V38 00/29] security: Add support for locking down the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1908130829070.3198@namei.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:29:33 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
cc:     LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V38 00/29] security: Add support for locking down the
 kernel

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, James Morris wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:08 PM James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> > > Please verify and test, as I had to make a few minor fixups for my v5.2
> > > base.
> > 
> > Thanks James - there's a few small fixups required, would you like
> > those as separate patches or should I just send you a fixed copy of
> > the original patchset?
> 
> Given there are a few, an updated copy of the patchset will be best.

Actually, that's a lot of patches to resend, just send updates against my 
next-lockdown branch.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>