linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Update cros_ec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190812072832.GO4594@dell>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:28:32 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        Yicheng Li <yichengli@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        "kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros_ec: Update cros_ec_commands.h

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On 11/7/19 19:17, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
> > 
> > Note there is a patch series that move cros_ec_commands.h from
> > nclude/linux/mfd/ to include/linux/platform_data.
> > 
> 
> I just sent a new version of the patches mentioned above now that rc1 is out [1]
> 
> As Gwendal said this patch will conflict with them, so we have two options.
> 
> 1. If Lee picks that patch I can rebase again my series on top of it.

Yes please.

> 2. If not, we can wait for Lee reviewing my patch series and then I don't mind
> to rebase that patch on top of my series and carry the patch through
> chrome-platform. Anyway I'll need an immutable branch from Lee.

I just reviewed your series.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog