linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] resource: add a not device managed request_free_mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190812074029.GA4709@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:40:29 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] resource: add a not device managed
 request_free_mem_region variant

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:52:58PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> It is a bit jarring to have something called devm_* that doesn't
> actually do the devm_ part on some paths.
> 
> Maybe this function should be called __request_free_mem_region() with
> another name wrapper macro?

Seems like a little more churn than required, but I could do it.