linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] net: macsec: move some definitions in a dedicated header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:17:31 +0200
From:   Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
To:     Igor Russkikh <Igor.Russkikh@...antia.com>
Cc:     Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "sd@...asysnail.net" <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "allan.nielsen@...rochip.com" <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        "camelia.groza@....com" <camelia.groza@....com>,
        Simon Edelhaus <Simon.Edelhaus@...antia.com>,
        Pavel Belous <Pavel.Belous@...antia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] net: macsec: move some definitions in a
 dedicated header

Hi Igor,

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:19:36PM +0000, Igor Russkikh wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * struct macsec_tx_sa - transmit secure association
> > + * @active:
> > + * @next_pn: packet number to use for the next packet
> > + * @lock: protects next_pn manipulations
> > + * @key: key structure
> > + * @stats: per-SA stats
> > + */
> > +struct macsec_tx_sa {
> > +	struct macsec_key key;
> > +	spinlock_t lock;
> > +	u32 next_pn;
> > +	refcount_t refcnt;
> > +	bool active;
> > +	bool offloaded;
> 
> I don't see this `offloaded` field being used anywhere. Is this needed?

You're right it's not and was only used in previous versions of this
patchset. I'll remove it.

Thanks for spotting this!
Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com