lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hCkibcbiYdPmBXdnDHZbGP2q0uNRi01oU0NMz5o3WwGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:59:58 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] acpi/hmat: Skip publishing target info for nodes with
 no online memory

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 4:30 PM Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
> There are multiple scenarios where the HMAT may contain information
> about proximity domains that are not currently online. Rather than fail
> to report any HMAT data just elide those offline domains.
>
> If and when those domains are later onlined they can be added to the
> HMEM reporting at that point.
>
> This was found while testing EFI_MEMORY_SP support which reserves
> "specific purpose" memory from the general allocation pool. If that
> reservation results in an empty numa-node then the node is not marked
> online leading a spurious:
>
>     "acpi/hmat: Ignoring HMAT: Invalid table"
>
> ...result for HMAT parsing.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

When you send somebody else's patches, you should sign them off as a
rule, but since you sent this one with your own R-by, I converted that
to a S-o-b.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ