linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] printk: use a new ringbuffer implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:54:00 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] printk: use a new ringbuffer implementation

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:16 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 12:07:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > End result: a DRAM buffer can work, but is not "reliable".
> > Particularly if you turn power on and off, data retention of DRAM is
> > iffy. But it's possible, at least in theory.
> >
> > So I have a patch that implements a "stupid ring buffer" for thisa
> > case, with absolutely zero data structures (because in the presense of
> > DRAM corruption, all you can get is "hopefully only slightly garbled
> > ASCII".
>
> Note that you can hook this into printk as a fake early serial device;
> just have the serial device write to the DRAM buffer.

Yep. Amiga had debug=mem for years, to write kernel messages to Chip
RAM, and retrieve them after a reboot. Cfr. amiga_console_driver and
arch/m68k/tools/amiga/dmesg.c.

BTW, with those old machines, it was not uncommon for DRAM retention
time to be 30s or so.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds