[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190812114256-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:43:36 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>, pagupta@...hat.com,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, lcapitulino@...hat.com,
wei.w.wang@...el.com, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] virtio-balloon: Add support for providing unused
page reports to host
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:20:43AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:53 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 03:42:19PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
>
> <snip>
>
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > > #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM 2 /* Deflate balloon on OOM */
> > > #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT 3 /* VQ to report free pages */
> > > #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON 4 /* Guest is using page poisoning */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING 5 /* Page reporting virtqueue */
> > >
> > > /* Size of a PFN in the balloon interface. */
> > > #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_PFN_SHIFT 12
> >
> > Just a small comment: same as any feature bit,
> > or indeed any host/guest interface changes, please
> > CC virtio-dev on any changes to this UAPI file.
> > We must maintain these in the central place in the spec,
> > otherwise we run a risk of conflicts.
> >
>
> Okay, other than that if I resubmit with the virtio-dev list added to
> you thing this patch set is ready to be acked and pulled into either
> the virtio or mm tree assuming there is no other significant feedback
> that comes in?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Alex
>From my POV yes. If it's my tree acks by mm folks will be necessary.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists