[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <996ead9b-457d-ef9c-4838-9438887b4da9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:30:57 +0200
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ep93xx: Mark expected switch fall-through
Hi!
On 08/08/2019 04:38, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm):
>
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do':
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may
> fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state));
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here
> case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT:
> ^~~~
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is
> modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c
> index 1c9a4be8b503..1c05c5bf7e5c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int crunch_do(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *t)
> * FALLTHROUGH: Ensure we don't try to overwrite our newly
> * initialised state information on the first fault.
> */
> + /* Fall through */
>
> case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT:
> crunch_task_release(thread);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists