linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: virtio_rpmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:39:27 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: virtio_rpmsg_bus: replace "%p" with "%pK"

On 8/12/19 11:36 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 8/12/19 12:28 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> On 8/12/19 10:47 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>> On 10/23/18 9:19 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> The virtio_rpmsg_bus driver uses the "%p" format-specifier for
>>>> printing the vring buffer address. This prints only a hashed
>>>> pointer even for previliged users. Use "%pK" instead so that
>>>> the address can be printed during debug using kptr_restrict
>>>> sysctl.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> s/previliged/privileged
>>
>> Bjorn,
>> Can you fix this up when applying.
>>
>>>
>>> You describe what the code does, but not why you need this. %pK is used
>>> for only about 1% of pointer printing, why do you want to leak this
>>> address to userspace at all?
>>
>> Andrew,
>> Default behavior of %pK is same as %p, but it does allow you to control
>> the print. The reason is clearly mentioned in the last sentence in the
>> patch description.
>>
> 
> 
> Let me rephrase then, why would you ever set 'kptr_restrict' to anything
> other than 0, or why do you want to be able to leak this address to
> userspace at all? If the answer is just because you can, then all 12,000
> instances of %p in kernel could be converted for the same reason.

It is a dev_dbg statement, so it is already under dynamic debug control.
We would only ever use it during debug.

regards
Suman

> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
>> regards
>> Suman
>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
>>>> index f29dee731026..1345f373a1a0 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
>>>> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>>  		goto vqs_del;
>>>>  	}
>>>>  
>>>> -	dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "buffers: va %p, dma %pad\n",
>>>> +	dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "buffers: va %pK, dma %pad\n",
>>>>  		bufs_va, &vrp->bufs_dma);
>>>>  
>>>>  	/* half of the buffers is dedicated for RX */
>>>>
>>