lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <931b027d-fdf3-220b-167a-4177fa917781@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:28:20 -0700
From:   Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
CC:     <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <marc.zyngier@....com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <stefan@...er.ch>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <jckuo@...dia.com>,
        <josephl@...dia.com>, <talho@...dia.com>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mperttunen@...dia.com>, <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 14/21] clk: tegra210: Add suspend and resume support


On 8/12/19 9:25 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 11.08.2019 22:15, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> On 8/11/19 10:39 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 09.08.2019 21:40, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>> On 8/9/19 11:18 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> 09.08.2019 19:19, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>> On 8/9/19 6:56 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>> 09.08.2019 2:46, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>> This patch adds support for clk: tegra210: suspend-resume.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All the CAR controller settings are lost on suspend when core
>>>>>>>> power goes off.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch has implementation for saving and restoring all PLLs
>>>>>>>> and clocks context during system suspend and resume to have the
>>>>>>>> clocks back to same state for normal operation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Clock driver suspend and resume are registered as syscore_ops as clocks
>>>>>>>> restore need to happen before the other drivers resume to have all their
>>>>>>>> clocks back to the same state as before suspend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>     drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>>     drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c          |  64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>     drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h          |   3 ++
>>>>>>>>     3 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
>>>>>>>> index 998bf60b219a..8dd6f4f4debb 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/of.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/export.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/mutex.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <dt-bindings/reset/tegra210-car.h>
>>>>>>>> -#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <linux/sizes.h>
>>>>>>>>     #include <soc/tegra/pmc.h>
>>>>>>>>     @@ -220,11 +220,15 @@
>>>>>>>>     #define CLK_M_DIVISOR_SHIFT 2
>>>>>>>>     #define CLK_M_DIVISOR_MASK 0x3
>>>>>>>>     +#define CLK_MASK_ARM    0x44
>>>>>>>> +#define MISC_CLK_ENB    0x48
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>     #define RST_DFLL_DVCO 0x2f4
>>>>>>>>     #define DVFS_DFLL_RESET_SHIFT 0
>>>>>>>>       #define CLK_RST_CONTROLLER_RST_DEV_Y_SET 0x2a8
>>>>>>>>     #define CLK_RST_CONTROLLER_RST_DEV_Y_CLR 0x2ac
>>>>>>>> +#define CPU_SOFTRST_CTRL 0x380
>>>>>>>>       #define LVL2_CLK_GATE_OVRA 0xf8
>>>>>>>>     #define LVL2_CLK_GATE_OVRC 0x3a0
>>>>>>>> @@ -2825,6 +2829,7 @@ static int tegra210_enable_pllu(void)
>>>>>>>>         struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table *fentry;
>>>>>>>>         struct tegra_clk_pll pllu;
>>>>>>>>         u32 reg;
>>>>>>>> +    int ret;
>>>>>>>>           for (fentry = pll_u_freq_table; fentry->input_rate; fentry++) {
>>>>>>>>             if (fentry->input_rate == pll_ref_freq)
>>>>>>>> @@ -2853,9 +2858,14 @@ static int tegra210_enable_pllu(void)
>>>>>>>>         reg |= PLL_ENABLE;
>>>>>>>>         writel(reg, clk_base + PLLU_BASE);
>>>>>>>>     -    readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(clk_base + PLLU_BASE, reg,
>>>>>>>> -                      reg & PLL_BASE_LOCK, 2, 1000);
>>>>>>>> -    if (!(reg & PLL_BASE_LOCK)) {
>>>>>>>> +    /*
>>>>>>>> +     * During clocks resume, same PLLU init and enable sequence get
>>>>>>>> +     * executed. So, readx_poll_timeout_atomic can't be used here as it
>>>>>>>> +     * uses ktime_get() and timekeeping resume doesn't happen by that
>>>>>>>> +     * time. So, using tegra210_wait_for_mask for PLL LOCK.
>>>>>>>> +     */
>>>>>>>> +    ret = tegra210_wait_for_mask(&pllu, PLLU_BASE, PLL_BASE_LOCK);
>>>>>>>> +    if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>             pr_err("Timed out waiting for PLL_U to lock\n");
>>>>>>>>             return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>> @@ -3288,6 +3298,84 @@ static void tegra210_disable_cpu_clock(u32 cpu)
>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>       #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>>> + * This array lists mask values for each peripheral clk bank
>>>>>>>> + * to mask out reserved bits during the clocks state restore
>>>>>>>> + * on SC7 resume to prevent accidental writes to these reserved
>>>>>>>> + * bits.
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> +static u32 periph_clk_rsvd_mask[TEGRA210_CAR_BANK_COUNT] = {
>>>>>>> Should be more natural to have a "valid_mask" instead of "rsvd_mask".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's actually wrong with touching of the reserved bits? They must be NO-OP.. or the
>>>>>>> reserved bits are actually some kind of "secret" bits? If those bits have some use-case
>>>>>>> outside of Silicon HW (like FPGA simulation), then this doesn't matter for upstream
>>>>>>> and you
>>>>>>> have to keep the workaround locally in the downstream kernel or whatever.
>>>>>> Will rename as valid_mask.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> some bits in these registers are undefined and is not good to write to these bits as they
>>>>>> can cause pslverr.
>>>>> Okay, it should be explained in the comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to disable trapping of changing the undefined bits?
>>>> No its internal to design
>>> Okay.
>>>
>>> Also, what about to move the valid_mask into struct tegra_clk_periph_regs?
>> No, we cannot move to tegra_clk_periph_regs as its in tegra/clk.c and is common for all tegra.
>>
>> Reserved bits are different on tegra chips so should come from Tegra chip specific clock
>> driver like
>>
>> clk-tegra210 for Tegra210.
> Could you please check whether the reserved bits are RAZ (read as zero)?
>
> [snip]

yes all reserved bits of clk_enb register is 0. This should not be set to 1.

As I will be changing to variable name to valid_mask instead of reserved 
mask, will also change values to valid mask so it can be used directly 
to write to clk_enb for enabling all peripherals clks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ