lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:57:47 +0530
From:   Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: core: Add of_node_put() before return

On 08/08/19 5:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 12:35:53PM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
>> In function of_get_child_regulator(), the loop for_each_child_of_node()
>> contains two mid-loop return statements. Ordinarily the loop gets the
>> node child at the beginning of every iteration and automatically puts
> 
> Please do not submit new versions of already applied patches, please
> submit incremental updates to the existing code.  Modifying existing
> commits creates problems for other users building on top of those
> commits so it's best practice to only change pubished git commits if
> absolutely essential.
> 
I am very sorry about this; I wasn't sure whether this particular commit 
had been applied. Should I split the commit and resend only the change 
to the old commit, or should I leave it as it is?

Thanking you,
Nishka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ