[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190813181113.GG13991@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:11:14 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] x86: KVM: svm: eliminate weird goto from
vmrun_interception()
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:53:34PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Regardless of whether or not nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm() fails, we return 1
> from vmrun_interception() so there's no point in doing goto. Also,
> nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm() call can be made from nested_svm_vmrun() where
> other nested launch issues are handled.
>
> nested_svm_vmrun() returns a bool, however, its result is ignored in
> vmrun_interception() as we always return '1'. As a preparatory change
> to putting kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() inside nested_svm_vmrun()
> make nested_svm_vmrun() return an int (always '1' for now).
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists