lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190813182520.2914520665@mail.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:25:19 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>, leoyang.li@....com,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-devel@...ux.nxdi.nxp.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liviu.dudau@....com
Cc:     Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
Subject: Re: [v1 1/3] clk: ls1028a: Add clock driver for Display output interface

Quoting Wen He (2019-08-12 03:01:03)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> index 801fa1cd0321..0e6c7027d637 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> @@ -223,6 +223,15 @@ config CLK_QORIQ
>           This adds the clock driver support for Freescale QorIQ platforms
>           using common clock framework.
>  
> +config CLK_PLLDIG
> +        bool "Clock driver for LS1028A Display output"
> +        depends on ARCH_LAYERSCAPE && OF

Does it actually depend on either of these to build? Probabl not, so
maybe just default ARCH_LAYERSCAPE && OF? Also, can your Kconfig
variable be named something more specific like CLK_LS1028A_PLLDIG?

> +        help
> +          This driver support the Display output interfaces(LCD, DPHY) pixel clocks
> +          of the QorIQ Layerscape LS1028A, as implemented TSMC CLN28HPM PLL. Not all
> +          features of the PLL are currently supported by the driver. By default,
> +          configured bypass mode with this PLL.
> +
>  config COMMON_CLK_XGENE
>         bool "Clock driver for APM XGene SoC"
>         default ARCH_XGENE
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c b/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..15c9bb623a70
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright 2019 NXP
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock driver for LS1028A Display output interfaces(LCD, DPHY).
> + *
> + * Author: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>

PLease remove this unused include.

> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>

Only makes sense to include this if it's a platform device driver.

> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
[...]
> +
> +static inline int plldig_wait_lock(struct clk_plldig *plldig)
> +{
> +       u32 csr;
> +       /*
> +       * Indicates whether PLL has acquired lock, if operating in bypass
> +       * mode, the LOCK bit will still assert when the PLL acquires lock
> +       * or negate when it loses lock.
> +       */
> +       return readl_poll_timeout(plldig->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLSR, csr,
> +                               csr & PLLDIG_LOCK_STATUS, 0, LOCK_TIMEOUT_US);
> +}
> +
> +static int plldig_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +       struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
> +       u32 val;
> +
> +       val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM);
> +       /*
> +        * Use Bypass mode with PLL off by default,the frequency overshoot

Please add a space after comma,

> +        * detector output was disable. SSCG Bypass mode should be enable.
> +        */
> +       val |= PLLDIG_SSCGBYP_ENABLE;
> +       writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM);
> +
[...]
> +
> +static int plldig_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +       struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
> +
> +       return (readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLFM) & PLLDIG_SSCGBYP_ENABLE);

Please remove extraneous parenthesis.

> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock configuration relationship between the PHI1 frequency(fpll_phi) and
> + * the output frequency of the PLL is determined by the PLLDV, according to
> + * the following equation:
> + * pxclk = fpll_phi / RFDPHI1 = (pll_ref x PLLDV[MFD]) / PLLDV[RFDPHI1].
> + */
> +static bool plldig_is_valid_range(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
> +               unsigned int *mult, unsigned int *rfdphi1,
> +               unsigned long *round_rate_base)
> +{
> +       u32 div, div_temp, mfd = PLLDIG_DEFAULE_MULT;
> +       unsigned long round_rate;
> +
> +       round_rate = parent_rate * mfd;
> +
> +       /* Range of the diliver for driving the PHI1 output clock */

divider? Not diliver, right?

> +       for (div = 1; div <= 63; div++) {
> +               /* Checking match with default mult number at first */
> +               if (round_rate / div == rate) {
> +                       *rfdphi1 = div;
> +                       *round_rate_base = round_rate;
> +                       *mult = mfd;
> +                       return true;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       for (div = 1; div <= 63; div++) {
> +               mfd = (div * rate) / parent_rate;
> +               /* Range of the muliplicationthe factor applied to the

/*
 * Please make multi line comments look like this
 */

> +                * output reference frequency
> +                */
> +               if ((mfd >= 10) && (mfd <= 150)) {
> +                       div_temp = (parent_rate * mfd) / rate;
> +                       if ((div_temp * rate) == (mfd * parent_rate)) {
> +                               *rfdphi1 = div_temp;
> +                               *mult = mfd;
> +                               *round_rate_base = mfd * parent_rate;
> +                               return true;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long plldig_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +               unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +       struct clk_plldig *plldig = to_clk_plldig(hw);
> +       u32 mult, div, val;
> +
> +       val = readl(plldig->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
> +       pr_info("%s: current configuration: 0x%x\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw), val);

Remove debug prints please.

> +
> +       /* Check if PLL is bypassed */
> +       if (val & PLLDIG_SSCGBYP_ENABLE)
> +               return parent_rate;
> +
> +       /* Checkout multiplication factor divider value */
> +       mult = val;
> +       mult = PLLDIG_GET_MULT(mult);
> +
> +       /* Checkout divider value of the output frequency */
> +       div = val;
> +       div = PLLDIG_GET_RFDPHI1(div);
> +
> +       return (parent_rate * mult) / div;
> +}
> +
> +static long plldig_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +               unsigned long *parent)
> +{
> +       unsigned long parent_rate = *parent;
> +       unsigned long round_rate;
> +       u32 mult = 0, rfdphi1 = 0;
> +       bool found = false;
> +
> +       found = plldig_is_valid_range(rate, parent_rate, &mult,
> +                                       &rfdphi1, &round_rate);
> +       if (!found) {
> +               pr_warn("%s: unable to round rate %lu, parent rate :%lu\n",
> +                               clk_hw_get_name(hw), rate, parent_rate);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return round_rate / rfdphi1;
> +}
> +
> +static int plldig_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +               unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +       struct clk_plldig *data = to_clk_plldig(hw);
> +       bool valid = false;
> +       unsigned long round_rate = 0;
> +       u32 rfdphi1 = 0, val, mult = 0;
> +
> +       valid = plldig_is_valid_range(rate, parent_rate, &mult,
> +                                       &rfdphi1, &round_rate);
> +       if (!valid) {
> +               pr_warn("%s: unable to support rate %lu, parent_rate: %lu\n",
> +                               clk_hw_get_name(hw), rate, parent_rate);
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
> +       val = mult;
> +       rfdphi1 = PLLDIG_SET_RFDPHI1(rfdphi1);
> +       val |= rfdphi1;
> +
> +       writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
> +
> +       return plldig_wait_lock(data);
> +}
> +
[...]
> +
> +struct clk_hw *_plldig_clk_init(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> +                               void __iomem *regs)
> +{
> +       struct clk_plldig *plldig;
> +       struct clk_hw *hw;
> +       struct clk_init_data init;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       plldig = kzalloc(sizeof(*plldig), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!plldig)
> +               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +       plldig->regs = regs;
> +
> +       init.name = name;
> +       init.ops = &plldig_clk_ops;
> +       init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> +       init.num_parents = 1;
> +       init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_GATE;
> +
> +       plldig->hw.init = &init;
> +
> +       hw = &plldig->hw;
> +       ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, hw);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               kfree(plldig);
> +               hw = ERR_PTR(ret);
> +       }
> +
> +       return hw;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init plldig_clk_init(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +       struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
> +       struct clk_hw **clks;
> +       void __iomem *base;
> +
> +       clk_data = kzalloc(struct_size(clk_data, hws, 1),
> +                       GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!clk_data)
> +               return;
> +
> +       clk_data->num = 1;
> +       clks = clk_data->hws;
> +
> +       base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +       WARN_ON(!base);
> +
> +       clks[0] = _plldig_clk_init("pixel-clk",
> +                       of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0), base);

Can you use the new way of specifying clk parents instead of calling
of_clk_get-parent_name() here? It would be simpler to just indicate
which index it is (I guess 0) or what the name is going to be in
"clock-names" in this DT node.

> +
> +       of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);

Why is this a #clock-cells = <1> device? It provides one clk, so
presumably it can be #clock-cells = <0> and then this can use
of_clk_hw_simple_get() instead.

> +}
> +
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(plldig_clockgen, "fsl,ls1028a-plldig", plldig_clk_init);

IS there a reason why this can't be a platform driver? It would be nice
to use platform device APIs.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ