[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190813044327.GR12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:13:27 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] drivers: dma: Fix sparse warning for
mux_configure32
On 12-08-19, 15:42, Mao Wenan wrote:
Patch title is incorrect, it should mention the changes in patch, for
example make mux_configure32 static
Do read up on Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst again!
> There is one sparse warning in drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c,
It will help to explain the warning before the fix
> fix it by setting mux_configure32() as static.
>
> make allmodconfig ARCH=mips CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux-gnu-
> make C=2 drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.o ARCH=mips CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux-gnu-
Make cmds are not relevant for the log
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c:93:6: warning: symbol 'mux_configure32' was not declared. Should it be static?
This one is and should be retained
>
> Fixes: 232a7f18cf8ec ("dmaengine: fsl-edma: add i.mx7ulp edma2 version support")
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
> index 6d6d8a4..7dbf7df 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ static void mux_configure8(struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan, void __iomem *addr,
> iowrite8(val8, addr + off);
> }
>
> -void mux_configure32(struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan, void __iomem *addr,
> - u32 off, u32 slot, bool enable)
> +static void mux_configure32(struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan, void __iomem *addr,
just change this to static
> + u32 off, u32 slot, bool enable)
and dont change anything else.
If you feel to change this, propose a new patch for this line explaining
why this should be changed
> {
> u32 val;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists