[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190813160726.3f9eb8c8@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:07:26 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: Best practice for embedded code samles? [Was: drm/drv: Use //
for comments in example code]
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 23:32:15 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> I wonder if there is a better way to embed a code sample
> than reverting to // style comments.
>
> As the kernel do not like // comments we should try to avoid them in
> examples.
If you're embedding a code sample *into a code comment* then I suspect
this is about as good as it gets. The alternative is to put it in as a
plain literal text block. That would lose the syntax highlighting; I
think that's an entirely bearable cost, but others seem to feel
differently about it.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists