linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] bus: ti-sysc: sysc_check_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <85a1d7eb-dd9a-2276-ed13-67291188538e@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:28:50 +0300
From:   Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:     Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bus: ti-sysc: sysc_check_one_child(): Change return
 type to void



On 13/08/2019 10:17, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> Change return type of function sysc_check_one_child() from int to void
> as it always returns 0. Accordingly, at its callsite, delete the
> variable that previously stored the return value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove error variable entirely.
> - Change return type of sysc_check_one_child().
> 
>  drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
> index e6deabd8305d..1c30fa58d70c 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
> @@ -615,8 +615,8 @@ static void sysc_check_quirk_stdout(struct sysc *ddata,
>   * node but children have "ti,hwmods". These belong to the interconnect
>   * target node and are managed by this driver.
>   */
> -static int sysc_check_one_child(struct sysc *ddata,
> -				struct device_node *np)
> +static void sysc_check_one_child(struct sysc *ddata,
> +				 struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	const char *name;
>  

You didn't remove the "return 0" at end of this function.
Doesn't it complain during build?

> @@ -633,12 +633,9 @@ static int sysc_check_one_child(struct sysc *ddata,
>  static int sysc_check_children(struct sysc *ddata)
>  {

This could return void as well.

>  	struct device_node *child;
> -	int error;
>  
>  	for_each_child_of_node(ddata->dev->of_node, child) {
> -		error = sysc_check_one_child(ddata, child);
> -		if (error)
> -			return error;
> +		sysc_check_one_child(ddata, child);
>  	}

You don't need the braces { }.

Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict on your patch and fix any
issues.

>  
>  	return 0;
> 

return not required.

You will also need to fix all instances using sysc_check_children()

cheers,
-roger
-- 
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki