[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190813082509.29324-3-kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:25:09 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: olvaffe@...il.com, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org (open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/virtio: notify virtqueues without holding spinlock
Split virtqueue_kick() call into virtqueue_kick_prepare(), which
requires serialization, and virtqueue_notify(), which does not. Move
the virtqueue_notify() call out of the critical section protected by the
queue lock. This avoids triggering a vmexit while holding the lock and
thereby fixes a rather bad spinlock contention.
Suggested-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
index ca91e83ffaef..e41c96143342 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_cursor_func(struct work_struct *work)
wake_up(&vgdev->cursorq.ack_queue);
}
-static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
+static bool virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf)
__releases(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock)
__acquires(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock)
@@ -260,10 +260,11 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->ctrlq.vq;
struct scatterlist *sgs[3], vcmd, vout, vresp;
int outcnt = 0, incnt = 0;
+ bool notify = false;
int ret;
if (!vgdev->vqs_ready)
- return;
+ return notify;
sg_init_one(&vcmd, vbuf->buf, vbuf->size);
sgs[outcnt + incnt] = &vcmd;
@@ -292,16 +293,21 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_queue(vq,
(struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *)vbuf->buf);
- virtqueue_kick(vq);
+ notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq);
}
+ return notify;
}
static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf)
{
+ bool notify;
+
spin_lock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
- virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
+ notify = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
+ if (notify)
+ virtqueue_notify(vgdev->ctrlq.vq);
}
static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
@@ -310,6 +316,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence)
{
struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->ctrlq.vq;
+ bool notify;
again:
spin_lock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
@@ -330,8 +337,10 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
if (fence)
virtio_gpu_fence_emit(vgdev, hdr, fence);
- virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
+ notify = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
+ if (notify)
+ virtqueue_notify(vgdev->ctrlq.vq);
}
static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
@@ -339,6 +348,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
{
struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->cursorq.vq;
struct scatterlist *sgs[1], ccmd;
+ bool notify;
int ret;
int outcnt;
@@ -361,10 +371,13 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_queue(vq,
(struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *)vbuf->buf);
- virtqueue_kick(vq);
+ notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq);
}
spin_unlock(&vgdev->cursorq.qlock);
+
+ if (notify)
+ virtqueue_notify(vq);
}
/* just create gem objects for userspace and long lived objects,
--
2.18.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists