[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878srxphz3.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:50:08 +0900
From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: kernel: hw_breakpoint: Fix missing break in switch statement
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:59:44 +0900,
Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> Add missing break statement in order to prevent the code from
> erroneously falling through to case SH_BREAKPOINT_WRITE.
>
> Fixes: 09a072947791 ("sh: hw-breakpoints: Add preliminary support for SH-4A UBC.")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>
> If no one cares, I'll apply this to my tree and queue it up for 5.3-rc4.
>
> arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 3bd010b4c55f..f10d64311127 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ int arch_bp_generic_fields(int sh_len, int sh_type,
> switch (sh_type) {
> case SH_BREAKPOINT_READ:
> *gen_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_R;
> + break;
> case SH_BREAKPOINT_WRITE:
> *gen_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_W;
> break;
> --
> 2.22.0
>
Applied sh-next.
Thanks.
--
Yosinori Sato
Powered by blists - more mailing lists