linux-kernel - Re: rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing, bug report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:23:50 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing, bug report

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:34:02PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Static analysis on linux-next today found an issue in the following commit:
> 
> commit 1afc4b18724f8f7b7a21fdf66cd43cc4a932812d
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> Date:   Tue Jul 2 16:03:33 2019 -0700
> 
>     rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
> 
> 
> The coverity report is as follows:
> 
> 1783        // If we have advanced to a new jiffy, reset counts to allow
> 1784        // moving back from ->nocb_bypass to ->cblist.
> 1785        if (j == rdp->nocb_nobypass_last) {
> 1786                c = rdp->nocb_nobypass_count + 1;
> 1787        } else {
> 1788                WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_nobypass_last, j);
> 1789                c = rdp->nocb_nobypass_count -
> nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy;
> 1790                if (c > nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy)
> 1791                        c = nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy;
> 
> CID 85141 (#1 of 1): Unsigned compared against 0
> unsigned_compare: This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is
> never true. c < 0UL.
> 
> 1792                else if (c < 0)
> 1793                        c = 0;
> 
> Variable c is an unsigned long so the c < 0 check is never true. I'm not
> sure what the ramifications are if c is made a signed long instead, so
> I'm not fixing this and reporting this issue.

Good catch!!!

How about the alleged fix shown below?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 91cefa3bf943..2defc7fe74c3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1787,10 +1787,11 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 	} else {
 		WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_nobypass_last, j);
 		c = rdp->nocb_nobypass_count - nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy;
-		if (c > nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy)
-			c = nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy;
-		else if (c < 0)
+		if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->nocb_nobypass_count,
+				 nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy))
 			c = 0;
+		else if (c > nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy)
+			c = nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy;
 	}
 	WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_nobypass_count, c);