linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190813153113.GD28441@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:31:13 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 05:57:32PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> drivers/base/core.c: In function 'device_links_read_lock_held':
> drivers/base/core.c:106:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'lock_is_held'; did you mean 'lockref_get'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   return lock_is_held(&device_links_lock);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>          lockref_get
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   4a3a5474b4c1 ("driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking")
> 
> lock_is_held() us only available if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set.

Joel, one approach would be to make lock_is_held() variant of
device_links_read_lock_held() be a macro rather than a function.
Another would be to use #ifdef so as to invoke lock_is_held() only when
lockdep is enabled.

Or do you have a better approach?

							Thanx, Paul

> I have reverted that commit for today.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell