[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez1xEt1zyMjwqS4Ysy7Vwtf4M1OOtYiPTdAmOGjViRCDvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:40:58 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christian Hansen <chansen3@...co.com>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>, fmayer@...gle.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, namhyung@...gle.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/page_idle: Add per-pid idle page tracking using
virtual index
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:30 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> [snip]
> > > +/* Helper to get the start and end frame given a pos and count */
> > > +static int page_idle_get_frames(loff_t pos, size_t count, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > + unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long max_frame;
> > > +
> > > + /* If an mm is not given, assume we want physical frames */
> > > + max_frame = mm ? (mm->task_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) : max_pfn;
> > > +
> > > + if (pos % BITMAP_CHUNK_SIZE || count % BITMAP_CHUNK_SIZE)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + *start = pos * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> > > + if (*start >= max_frame)
> > > + return -ENXIO;
> > > +
> > > + *end = *start + count * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> > > + if (*end > max_frame)
> > > + *end = max_frame;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > You could add some overflow checks for the multiplications. I haven't
> > seen any place where it actually matters, but it seems unclean; and in
> > particular, on a 32-bit architecture where the maximum user address is
> > very high (like with a 4G:4G split), it looks like this function might
> > theoretically return with `*start > *end`, which could be confusing to
> > callers.
>
> I could store the multiplication result in unsigned long long (since we are
> bounds checking with max_frame, start > end would not occur). Something like
> the following (with extraneous casts). But I'll think some more about the
> point you are raising.
check_mul_overflow() exists and could make that a bit cleaner.
> > This means that BITMAP_CHUNK_SIZE is UAPI on big-endian systems,
> > right? My opinion is that it would be slightly nicer to design the
> > UAPI such that incrementing virtual addresses are mapped to
> > incrementing offsets in the buffer (iow, either use bytewise access or
> > use little-endian), but I'm not going to ask you to redesign the UAPI
> > this late.
>
> That would also be slow and consume more memory in userspace buffers.
> Currently, a 64-bit (8 byte) chunk accounts for 64 pages worth or 256KB.
I still wanted to use one bit per page; I just wanted to rearrange the
bits. So the first byte would always contain 8 bits corresponding to
the first 8 pages, instead of corresponding to pages 56-63 on some
systems depending on endianness. Anyway, this is a moot point, since
as you said...
> Also I wanted to keep the interface consistent with the global
> /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle interface.
Sorry, I missed that this is already UAPI in the global interface. I
agree, using a different API for the per-process interface would be a
bad idea.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists