[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <277937a7-0f50-ec1c-09ec-95ffbf85541e@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 00:11:36 +0900
From:   Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tools/memory-model: Update comment of jugdelitmus.sh
Hi Paul,
I see some inconsistency between the header comment of judgelitmus.sh
and the updated script.
This patch set updates the header. It is relative to current lkmm-dev
of -rcu.
Patch 1/2 corresponds to ("tools/memory-model: Move from
.AArch64.litmus.out to .litmus.AArch.out").
Patch 2/2 corresponds to ("tools/memory-model: Add data-race
capabilities to judgelitmus.sh").
You should be able to use each patch as a fix-up commit respectively.
I'm OK either with them applied at the head of the branch or
with them merged into your commits.
        Thanks, Akira
--
Akira Yokosawa (2):
  tools/memory-model: Reflect updated file name convention in
    judgelitmus.sh
  tools/memory-model: Mention data-race capability in jugdelitmus.sh's
    header
 tools/memory-model/scripts/judgelitmus.sh | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
-- 
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
