[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814160711.GA5816@kunai>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:07:11 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Cooks <acooks@...ionali.st>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, platypus-sw@...ngear.com,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Will Wagner <willw@...allon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus
> > Unfortunately not. I only picked up from where Andrew Cooks left, due
> > to me being way too slow to review his patches.
>
> @Andrew: can you tell us more about this ?
Was the info Andrew supplied helpful to you?
>
> > I was able to test the first 2 patches which fix bugs, but
> > not the 3rd one which deals with ACPI devices. There does not seem to
> > be any such device on the 2 test machines I have remotely access to.
>
> Did you already test on apu2/apu3 ?
> If not, maybe you could prepare a queue that I could test.
Maybe I am missing something but can't you just apply these patches on a
recent kernel?
So, the discussion stalled, but I think the series is fine as is? If
someone disagrees, please speak up. I want to apply patch 1 to
for-current soon and the others to for-next, too.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists