[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190814180021.165389-1-liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:00:21 +0800
From: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shanpeic@...ux.alibaba.com, xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: don't assign runtime for throttled cfs_rq
do_sched_cfs_period_timer() will refill cfs_b runtime and call
distribute_cfs_runtime() to unthrottle cfs_rq, sometimes cfs_b->runtime
will allocate all quota to one cfs_rq incorrectly.
This will cause other cfs_rq can't get runtime and will be throttled.
We find that one throttled cfs_rq has non-negative
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining and cause an unexpetced cast from s64 to u64
in snippet: distribute_cfs_runtime() {
runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1; }.
This cast will cause that runtime will be a large number and
cfs_b->runtime will be subtracted to be zero at last.
This commit prevents cfs_rq to be assgined new runtime if it has been
throttled to avoid the above incorrect type cast.
Signed-off-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 81fd8a2a605b..b14d67d28138 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4068,6 +4068,8 @@ static void __account_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 delta_exec)
if (likely(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0))
return;
+ if (cfs_rq->throttled)
+ return;
/*
* if we're unable to extend our runtime we resched so that the active
* hierarchy can be throttled
--
2.14.4.44.g2045bb6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists