[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814040558.GT12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:35:58 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
broonie@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plai@...eaurora.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, spapothi@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: Add compute_params callback
On 13-08-19, 14:08, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 8/13/19 1:17 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 13/08/2019 15:34, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > On 8/13/19 3:35 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > > > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > This callback allows masters to compute the bus parameters required.
> > >
> > > This looks like a partial use of the patch ('soundwire: Add Intel
> > > resource management algorithm')? see comments below
> > >
> >
> > Yes it duplicate indeed!
> >
> > I will use that patch!
>
> Actually please don't...
> we found issues with the Intel allocation so I'd rather have the big Intel
> patch split into two parts, with callbacks+prepare/deprepare changes going
> in first. It'll be much faster/nicer for everyone.
I was about to say that as well. I think lets take this as is and Intel
algo can be on top of this. That seems easier for everyone to sort
dependencies
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists