[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814075324.GB4067@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:53:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Kelsey Skunberg <skunberg.kelsey@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Bodong Wang <bodong@...lanox.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: sysfs: Change
permissions from symbolic to octal
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:38:46AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Bodong, Don, Greg for permission question]
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 02:45:12PM -0600, Kelsey Skunberg wrote:
> > Symbolic permissions such as "(S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP)" are not
> > preferred and octal permissions should be used instead. Change all
> > symbolic permissions to octal permissions.
> >
> > Example of old:
> >
> > "(S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP)"
> >
> > Example of new:
> >
> > "0220"
>
>
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_totalvfs);
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR(sriov_numvfs, (S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP),
> > - sriov_numvfs_show, sriov_numvfs_store);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR(sriov_numvfs, 0664, sriov_numvfs_show, sriov_numvfs_store);
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_offset);
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_stride);
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sriov_vf_device);
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR(sriov_drivers_autoprobe, (S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP),
> > - sriov_drivers_autoprobe_show, sriov_drivers_autoprobe_store);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR(sriov_drivers_autoprobe, 0664, sriov_drivers_autoprobe_show,
> > + sriov_drivers_autoprobe_store);
>
> Greg noticed that sriov_numvfs and sriov_drivers_autoprobe have
> "unusual" permissions. These were added by:
>
> 0e7df22401a3 ("PCI: Add sysfs sriov_drivers_autoprobe to control VF driver binding")
> 1789382a72a5 ("PCI: SRIOV control and status via sysfs")
>
> Kelsey's patch correctly preserves the existing permissions, but we
> should double-check that they are the permissions they want, and
> possibly add a comment about why they're different from the rest.
I agree. And if those permissions are ok, please put a HUGE comment in
here saying why they are what they are and why they need to stay that
way so we don't have this conversation again in a few years :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists